[SGVLUG] ack -- finally got "wormed" at work
Zack, James
jzack at unex.ucla.edu
Wed Aug 17 11:00:28 PDT 2005
Heh, I didn't want to go there (considering the subject).
Yes, you are right. Had one patched they would not have been impacted by
this particular worm. I was speaking more in terms of generalities than
anything else... Having seen my fair share of worms after running an open
lab for students.
-JZ
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Proctor-Smith [mailto:mproctor13 at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 10:53 AM
To: SGVLUG Discussion List.
Subject: Re: [SGVLUG] ack -- finally got "wormed" at work
On 8/17/05, Zack, James <jzack at unex.ucla.edu> wrote:
> It's getting to the point where a vulnerability is revealed and a
> worm/virus written to exploit it before the vendors have a patch
> available. So having a system fully up to date doesn't assure you
> protection (heck, nothing
> does!)
True but this perticular worm was not written until after the patch was
available.
More information about the SGVLUG
mailing list