[SGVLUG] RPM hell -- why not just change to debian?
Dustin
laurence at alice.caltech.edu
Wed Nov 23 10:45:21 PST 2005
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> Dustin wrote:
> >The idea of doing automatic updates gives me the willies, though. I don't
> >trust *anybody* that much, not even Debian, on a box I need. I'm not
> >willing to see the toolchain or some other vital part upgrade without me
> >deciding when it's going to happen.
> Only run testing or unstable on systems you manage often.
Granted, but I wouldn't auto-update Debian Stable either, though if you
told me I *had* to then it would either be Debian Stable or a Slackware
release.
> Auto-update is not the problem.
Anything that touches a vital service (toolchain, core system libraries,
probably ssh) on a machine that matters is a problem to me. I need to be
there to make sure things wen't safely. Automatically updating the
package database and emailing me a list of waiting packages, on the other
hand, is very good.
All that said, I'd much rather auto-update a Debian or Slack box than
MS-Windows!
Dustin
More information about the SGVLUG
mailing list