[SGVLUG] Quantum leap in spam rate today?
Dustin Laurence
dustin at laurences.net
Sat Dec 23 15:57:49 PST 2006
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 02:57:02PM -0800, Christopher Smith wrote:
> >
> Yes. I've seen a quantum leap in the spam rate today, and by that I mean
> the smallest measurable change. ;-)
You saw a difference of h_bar/2 messages? What observables does one
commute to obtain the uncertainty in the case of email messages?
Perhaps it is a matter of state transitions and one needs to solve for
the eigenstates and not try to hand-wave an uncertainty calculation?
What observable gives the eigenspectrum?
My mind boggles at the virtuoso application of quantum theory you guys
are developing....
> P.S.: Sorry, it's a pet peeve of mine.
While it isn't actually a term with a technical meaning (try to find
"quantum leap" used in the literature), I don't think you should define
a "quantum leap" as "the smallest measurable unit of change either. But
it's a lot better than "really amazingly staggeringly big," that I grant
you. :-)
Dustin, "the number of spam messages in your inbox is indeterminate
until you open it"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.sgvlug.net/pipermail/sgvlug/attachments/20061223/00e43c48/attachment.bin
More information about the SGVLUG
mailing list