[SGVLUG] How'd they do that?

[Michael Proctor-Smith]

On 8/20/07, matti <mathew_2000 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > Not hard the image is
> > http://est.rbma.com/content/Baby_Blues?date=20070806
> > a cgi or script of sometype if you load the image with a blank
> > incorrect referror you get the no referrer image. The cooller part
> > would be if it was called baby_blues_20070806.jpg{.gif or .png}
>
> hmmm...
>
> when I do a "view image" on mozilla,
> does it reload the picture? (obviously i guess it does..
> which is stupid imho.. )
>
> referrer, since I am doing view image from the
> original page, won't the referrer be the
> original page then?

Probably has no cahceing set so mozilla does the "right thing" and as
least checking if the file has an update. That explains why they when
the blah?bhah route because many proxies will not respect no
cache(http header) but will never cache a cgi generated content.


> matti
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
> http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow
>