[SGVLUG] Privacy Rights - Obama demands full disclosure from applications

[Dan Borne]

I agree completely, but should one really be prosecuted for some supid
comment that was made whilst drunk, angry etc?

2008/11/14 Joel Witherspoon <joel.witherspoon at gmail.com>

> Clinton and Bush Sr. did nearly the same thing. They would have someone go
> through all your college papers and theses or any published works looking
> for any red flag. Obama is vetting for subversive or just plain
> irresponsible blog postings. I think it is necessary to an extent. Remember
> this is the *public* sector; even your salary is not private. If anyone is
> worried about the vetting, they shouldn't apply.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Dan Borne <danborne.kde at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think with everything that anyone on here has posted, it might be better
>> just to lie, for one thing may pass through...
>>
>>
>> Isn't that illegal? That seems like unnecessary invasion of privacy.
>>
>> Cheers!
>>
>> 2008/11/14 matti <mathew_2000 at yahoo.com>
>>
>>
>>> lol!
>>>
>>> my brain must have been thinking of programming
>>> when I wrote this...
>>>
>>> I meant applicants. ;)
>>>
>>>
>>> Re: [SGVLUG] Privacy Rights - Obama demands full disclosure from
>>> applications
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.sgvlug.net/pipermail/sgvlug/attachments/20081114/d180e4b9/attachment.html