[SGVLUG] This is the droid you've been writing for...

[Tom Emerson]

On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 8:37 PM, John E. Kreznar <jek at ininx.com> wrote:
...
> Clause 3.3 there is immediately followed by
>
>   3.4 Use, reproduction and distribution of components of the SDK
>   licensed under an open source software license are governed solely
>   by the terms of that open source software license and not this
>   License Agreement.
>
> How can clauses 3.3 and 3.4 be reconciled?  Can we assume from the
> project name ("Android Open Source Project") that everything here is
> open source?  Then why is the reverse engineering clause in there at
> all?

lazy lawyers and boilerplate?