[SGVLUG] ATT DSL Gateway choices, which gateway do you like?

[Dan Buthusiem]

Doug, can you get me your line levels? In the usual screens for that info,
there should be something labeled "_____ path" with either 'interleaved' or
'fast' as a value. Fast path gives you lower pings (10-20ms), but is less
resilient against noise. Interleaved can handle noisier lines, at a cost of
having a higher ping (45-70ms). My guess is the tech changed your config in
the DSLAM to compensate for a deteriorating line. A Level 2 tech can
explain it to you if you're savvy enough to hold on to all the frequency
explanations. You can have the tech remotely change you back to fast path
if you're on interleaved, but if you start having sync problems, you'll
have to go back.
On Aug 13, 2012 1:28 AM, "Doug" <dougvargas at sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> Ugh story of my life...I USED to have under 10ms ping to my favorite
> counter strike server, att came out and made "repairs" and now I'm lucky if
> I get 50, it's a great quantitative measurement of how much they suck lol.
> Not to mention that their static ip service comes with a router THAT WON'T
> ROUTE IP ADDRESSES. I'm going to be switching isps, my deepest sympathies
> that you can't :(
>
> Matthew Campbell <dvdmatt at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I have uVerse and POTS.  They never asked me to drop one for the other.
> >
> >I had a 6Mbit connection for years, then AT&T 'upgraded' wiring in our
> >neighborhood and my rate dropped to 2.  I called, I complained, I ranted
> >and raved and they insisted that I had never had better than 2 and that I
> >should go away.  I ended up having to cut the wire to my house and hook
> the
> >modem up outside to show them the poor rate.  They came out and fixed it,
> >back to 6Mb/s finally!  Four weeks later it dropped back to 2.  I ranted
> >and raved and they eventually fixed it.  Four months later it dropped
> >again.  This time they fixed it in 48 hours.  All in all, just counting
> the
> >hours I have logged I have spent 92 unpaid hours on the phone with AT&T
> >sorting out their incorrect billing or crappy service over the last 2
> years.
> >
> >They are the worst company I have ever had the misfortune to deal with.
> >
> >And they have the government backed monopoly in my neighborhood, no way to
> >change to anything else.
> >
> >Matt
> >
> >P.S.  In their favor their billing was never off more than $500 and they
> >didn't cut my service more than twice due to their own internal billing
> >mistakes.
> >
> >---------
> >*Matthew Campbell*
> >Storage Solution Consultant
> >Storage Design and Engineering
> >
> >*Kaiser Permanente*
> >IMG-Systems Integration
> >99 S. Oakland
> >Pasadena, CA 91101
> >
> >626-564-7228 (office)
> >8-338-7228 (tie-line)
> >818-314-9897 (mobile phone)
> >Green Center 3-North, 031W29
> >---------
> >*kp.org/thrive*
> >
> >
> >
> >On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Scott Packard <spackard at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> > Just make sure you still have a regular copper drop in the event of an
> >> emergency. Sure, the VoIP gateway has a hefty battery backup, but I
> still
> >> prefer having an old fashioned phone line just in case (911 doesn't
> require
> >> a phone service account with telco, just a working jack with dial tone).
> >>
> >> You can't.  If you sign up for Uverse they force you off of POTS.
> >> I've been there, tried that.  Fought that.  Wrote letters.
> >>
> >> Regards, Scott
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Dan Buthusiem <dan.buthusiem at gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> Just make sure you still have a regular copper drop in the event of an
> >>> emergency. Sure, the VoIP gateway has a hefty battery backup, but I
> still
> >>> prefer having an old fashioned phone line just in case (911 doesn't
> require
> >>> a phone service account with telco, just a working jack with dial
> tone).
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.sgvlug.net/pipermail/sgvlug/attachments/20120813/8b5c3a47/attachment-0001.html