<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Dustin wrote:
<blockquote
cite="midPine.LNX.4.44.0507012241340.26065-100000@alice.wonderland.caltech.edu"
type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">There is some concern about the "banner" that appears -- this can be
used for good or evil it appears
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->Ooh! Evil! Evil! I vote for Evil!!!
</pre>
</blockquote>
Fear not! I used my powers for good and created a non-evil banner.<br>
<blockquote
cite="midPine.LNX.4.44.0507012241340.26065-100000@alice.wonderland.caltech.edu"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I think there is a template facility, which is probably what controls
layout.</pre>
</blockquote>
I'm assuming (without having done any research whatsover to back it up)
that we can customize and/or create the templates to do whatever we
want. The default template is a combination of table-based layout (boo)
and css (yay). It's awfully busy.<br>
<blockquote
cite="midPine.LNX.4.44.0507012241340.26065-100000@alice.wonderland.caltech.edu"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">What threw me is that the way they distinguish mouseover from
non-mouseover for icons is to grey them out normally and then color them
in on mouseover. Logical, I guess--but doesn't *Every Freakin' GUI
Program In the World* use greyed out buttons to mean "not available"? I
think so, and so I tend to just skip right over greyed out things. Took
me a while to realize all the controls are greyed out until you mouseover
them.
</pre>
</blockquote>
Yes, I too found that to be counterintuitive.<br>
<br>
Doug<br>
</body>
</html>